#看见#《十二怒汉》1957版，那孩子有罪还是无罪？谁也不知道，但不能因此就判他有罪，更不能用已有的价值观去做任何道德性的评判。去年“白人齐默曼与黑人马丁”的案件，齐默曼被无罪释放，官方没有刻意去制造齐默曼无罪的舆论，而是非常诚恳的表达，无罪判决并不意味着马丁是坏人齐默曼是好人，这只意味着检察官的无力证明，甚至不意味着齐默曼没做非法的事，仅仅是检察官没能证明。
As we are still in the sadness of the past of Elizabeth Taylor, we lost Sidney Lumet today. Therefore, it is time to have a review of his most impressive movie.
A life was on the hand of jury, which was made up of 12 men. At first, every evidence pointed out the guilty of the boy. Only one man was not sure. He then successfully traced insignificant details to prove that the boy is not. The jury at last all agreed to not guilty.
Reasonable doubt is the fundamental of the western legal system. The movie provided me a clear picture about how the jury works, enriching my understanding of American democracy.
The movie was also prefect in characterize every man. Within one and a half hour, everybody’s life is exposed to the public. #8 jury was really something, convincing everybody by obvious reasons.
Black and white does not affect its quality. It is legendary.
《十二怒汉》中的逻辑思想
转载请注明网址: https://www.hbmrpos.com/tiantang/kandianying-1506.html
